Hermeneutical Injustice and Unworlding in Psychopathology
نویسندگان
چکیده
The rich literature in phenomenological psychopathology regards the communicative difficulties accompanying psychiatric illness as a product of ‘unworlding‘: experience drastic change one’s habitual field experience. This paper argues that relationship between speech expression and unworlding is more complex than previously assumed. Not only does cause breakdown expression, but can perpetuate, even exacerbate, characteristic illness. In other words, I identify two-way communication Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology drawn upon to demonstrate how hermeneutical injustice healthcare elicit for person with
منابع مشابه
Inspired Subjectivity and Hermeneutical Objectivity
Objectivity is the goal of hermeneutics so that the text of Scripture may speak for itself. For an interpreter to bring his subjective views to the text jeopardizes the authority o f the Word. Two forces at work among evangelicals today tend to increase the subjective element in interpretation. The first is the principle of the analogy of faith or the harmonizing of different texts with one ano...
متن کاملEpistemic Injustice and Illness
This article analyses the phenomenon of epistemic injustice within contemporary healthcare. We begin by detailing the persistent complaints patients make about their testimonial frustration and hermeneutical marginalization, and the negative impact this has on their care. We offer an epistemic analysis of this problem using Miranda Fricker's account of epistemic injustice. We detail two types o...
متن کاملEpistemic injustice in psychiatry
It has been argued that those who suffer from medical conditions are more vulnerable to epistemic injustice (a harm done to a person in their capacity as an epistemic subject) than healthy people. This editorial claims that people with mental disorders are even more vulnerable to epistemic injustice than those with somatic illnesses. Two kinds of contributory factors are outlined, global and sp...
متن کاملRational Injustice
Different attempts have been made to answer Reich's question why the majority of those who are hungry don't steal and why the majority of those who are exploited don't strike. The two most influential approaches have been the ideological one and the gunman theory. The gunman theory seems to have the upper hand in that it not only explains many cases of successful oppression by a minority of a m...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Philosophical Psychology
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['1465-394X', '0951-5089']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2023.2166821